The Bihar Cricket Association , the petitioner in the case of the current Supreme Court against BCCI , says he will find a bar in N Srinivasan on behalf of the board of the International Criminal Court , and will even look to take legal struggle on that front outside India . The following case goes to a hearing before the Supreme Court on Tuesday .
The ICC , which was not officially registered any protest or public discussion on the issue last Srinivasan , an official Full board member said that the CAB plan “should be music to the ears ” of their colleagues in other boards . The International Criminal Court and the other nine full members – who have considered an internal matter of BCCI – are essentially looking for the Supreme Court to address the issue of Srinivasan to be the representative of India in council meetings CPI .
The Supreme Court has held until now that Srinivasan ” can not return as president of BCCI ” until completion of an investigation into alleged spot -fixing and betting scandal in IPL. However, Srinivasan attended the meeting of the ICC , on 9 and 10 April , and will become the new president in July.
At its hearing on Tuesday , the Supreme Court had asked Mukul Mudgal – who conducted the initial report that resulted Srinivasan was ordered to withdraw the rights of BCCI – to assume more power research because the probe panel proposed by the BCCI was involved in a conflict of interest. On Tuesday , the court is likely to hear from Mudgal panel about the terms of reference and the type of assistance necessary to carry out the probe.
With the court should enter their holiday break on May 11 , the petitioners are likely to defend with greater urgency to the exclusion of Srinivasan ICC .
Aditya Verma , secretary of the Cricket Association of unrecognized Bihar, said he was confident the court would be favorable to his request . “This is a well-defined technical issue . If you have been excluded from the BCCI , how can you go to the International Criminal Court The BCCI is a member organization of the International Criminal Court, and they are representing BCCI alone, right? ”
The court may , however, consider that the ICC is an international body and not within its jurisdiction, or even point to the absence of protest from the ICC or any of its members against Srinivasan .
” The same happened with the BCCI ,” Verma said. ” The members do not withstand Srinivasan BCCI . Similarly, if the ICC does not hold, and if it falls under the jurisdiction of our court , will not help to go and fight him in Dubai, where the ICC is based. ”
Earlier this week, Nalini Chidambaram , one of the attorneys for the plaintiff, ESPNcricinfo had said that they had made a prayer against the role of ICC Srinivasan and Srinivasan ‘s insistence she is compared to be part of the ICC “a man who is not fit to be a judge of the high Court, but who wants to be a judge of the Supreme Court.”
It is understood that at the last meeting of the Executive Board of the ICC , held in Dubai on April 9 to 10 , some of the directors of the board had raised concerns – more than murmurs vocal objections – against the presence of Srinivasan . However Srinivasan is believed to have responded by saying it was a couple of unhappy people trying to drag him up. His message, the official member of the board , he said , was approved by the President of the other table , it was responding to the few questions that were raised.
Srinivasan ‘s detractors say is a direct violation of Rule 2.1 of the ICC Code of Ethics which states: . ” Each Director shall they act honestly and ethically To facilitate transparent functioning of the ICC , the conduct that gives the appearance of impropriety is also unacceptable . Administration not engage in any conduct that in any way denigrates the ICC or damage your image public . no funds or assets of the ICC can be used for any illegal purpose , and no director may participate in unlawful conduct. ”
According to the official board member , the Code of Ethics of the ICC says that ” each of the directors have an affirmative obligation ” to challenge Srinivasan . In accordance with Rule 8 3 in the Code of Ethics of the ICC . ” Each director has the obligation not only to respect the code of ethics , but also to report violations of the Code of Ethics when they find them. ” Hen They Become aware of them. “…
No comments:
Post a Comment